Question 2: Martin Luther King and Henry David Thoreau justify civil disobedienc

Need help with assignments?

Our qualified writers can create original, plagiarism-free papers in any format you choose (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, etc.)

Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.

Click Here To Order Now

Question 2:
Martin Luther King and Henry David Thoreau justify civil disobedienc

Question 2:
Martin Luther King and Henry David Thoreau justify civil disobedience by arguing that unjust
laws can be disobeyed because unjust laws have no moral force.
On the other hand, almost all the authors (but not all) you have read in Curtis’s two volumes
argue that laws must be obeyed, that individuals have neither the right nor the power to say
which laws are just or unjust.
Compare and contrast the two opposing positions on civil disobedience. Pick a side. Discuss
what an unjust law is. Besides discussing Thoreau and King, you must also discuss at least 1
other assigned author from the Civil Disobedience book. Do not rely on an author from Blaisdell
I did not assign. You must also use at least two authors from Curtis, but are encouraged to use as
many authors from Curtis as you wish; again, do not include authors from Curtis I have not
assigned in class.
Must use books: Essays on Civil Disobedience by Bob Blaisdell 
The Great Political Theories by Michael Curtis (both volume 1 and 2)

Need help with assignments?

Our qualified writers can create original, plagiarism-free papers in any format you choose (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, etc.)

Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.

Click Here To Order Now