English 1B Essay #3 Many argue that certain conditions should or should not exi

Need help with assignments?

Our qualified writers can create original, plagiarism-free papers in any format you choose (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, etc.)

Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.

Click Here To Order Now

English 1B
Essay #3
Many argue that certain conditions should or should not exi

English 1B
Essay #3
Many argue that certain conditions should or should not exist. For your third formal essay, choose an approved topic from the Opposing Viewpoints Database, and write a thesis driven essay that argues for or against a specific policy. What should or should not, must or must not, ought to, or ought notbe instituted as a solution or resolution to a problem.
Frame your policy argument around existing or proposed policies that you identify in your research articles. Identify a problem, and make a case for how your policy will resolve or diminish that problem. You must include at least five credible sources. At least one of your sources should examine an opposing viewpoint on your topic. Make sure your sources are credible.
Remember, policy claims call for analysis of both fact and value. Your thesis should include expressions such as: should, must, ought to, should not, must not, or ought not.
Don’t forget to incorporate ethos, logos, and pathos into your argument. You should also discuss any myths or assumptions that often used to argue the opposing viewpoint. Concede or refute these myths and/or assumptions to strengthen your position.
You may use the sample essay from the Lecture Notes,“Organ Donations: A Life Saving Gift,” as a template for setting up your own essay (we will be reviewing this in our lecture notes).
The position/policy is clear and arguable
The case is fully developed with reasons and evidence (supported by credible research) Opposing positions are clearly defined in terms of claims and real interests
The essay identifies and examines specific areas of agreement and disagreement
Supporting evidence is relevant and accurate
The essay employs, and/or discusses an ethical/moral appeal relevant to the policy under discussion
The essay includes at least five well-integrated and credible sources
Reasoned thinking is convincing and consistent with evidence presented
There are consistent and respectful representations of opposing perspectives
Sentence form varies and essay demonstrates an effective persuasive tone and word choice
The essay demonstrates correct use of MLA standards and errors do not distract or impede clarity or understanding of the essay.

Need help with assignments?

Our qualified writers can create original, plagiarism-free papers in any format you choose (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, etc.)

Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.

Click Here To Order Now